Mafia Kings
June 20, 2013, 08:09:26 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: MafiaKings.com
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
  Print  
Author Topic: New Jersey Warehouse  (Read 8325 times)
iSleptwithJC
Guest
« Reply #45 on: December 12, 2010, 05:49:11 PM »

Business Street
Stock Market
Job Center
Bank
School
Hitman Listings
Warehouse

Im suggesting a warehouse.
 ... like in the city there is a link that says "warehouse" or "local warehouse"
... Clicking it takes you to a page that says:

Controlled By:
GANG IMAGE
POSTED UP HERE


Acquired: 17 July 2009, 20:32
Ownership: 2 days 11 hrs 34 min
Up for grabs: 12 hrs 26 min

CHALLENGE gangsNAMEhere


Who ever controls it gets the money each roll over.

 New Jersey Warehouse - generates 50k-80k a day..
  Gang in control has it for 6 days then there is a 20 hour period were someone can challenge to a 12 hour war.. but if a gang misses there chance to start WAR with them... then the gang holds the warehouse for another 6 days.
 Must NOT have players level 20 or higher...

 Los Angeles Warehouse - generates 70k-120k a day..
  Gang in control has it for 6 days then there is a 20 hour period were someone can challenge to a 12 hour war.. but if a gang misses there chance to start WAR with them... then the gang holds the warehouse for another 6 days.
 Must NOT have players level 23 or higher...

 New York Warehouse - generates 100k-190k a day..
  Gang in control has it for 4 days then there is a 20 hour period were someone can challenge to a 12 hour war.. but if a gang misses there chance to start WAR with them... then the gang holds the warehouse for another 4 days.
 Must NOT have players level 26 or higher...

 Baltimore Warehouse - generates 175k-250k a day..
  Gang in control has it for 4 days then there is a 20 hour period were someone can challenge to a 12 hour war.. but if a gang misses there chance to start WAR with them... then the gang holds the warehouse for another 4 days.
 Must NOT have players level 30 or higher...

 Boston Warehouse - generates 240k-325k a day..
  Gang in control has it for 3 days then there is a 20 hour period were someone can challenge to a 12 hour war.. but if a gang misses there chance to start WAR with them... then the gang holds the warehouse for another 3 days.
Must NOT have players level 33 or higher...

 Denver Warehouse - generates 300k-500k a day..
  Gang in control has it for 3 days then there is a 24 hour period were someone can challenge to a 24 hour war.. but if a gang misses there chance to start WAR with them... then the gang holds the warehouse for another 3 days.
 Must NOT have players level 38 or higher...

 Springfield Warehouse - generates 350k-600k a day..
  Gang in control has it for 3 days then there is a 24 hour period were someone can challenge to a 24 hour war.. but if a gang misses there chance to start WAR with them... then the gang holds the warehouse for another 3 days.
 Must NOT have players level 45 or higher...

 Toledo Warehouse - generates 400k-700k a day..
  Gang in control has it for 2 days then there is a 36 hour period were someone can challenge to a 24 hour war.. but if a gang misses there chance to start WAR with them... then the gang holds the warehouse for another 2 days.
 Must NOT have players level 50 or higher...

 Washington DC Warehouse - generates 450k-800k a day..
  Gang in control has it for 2 days then there is a 36 hour period were someone can challenge to a 24 hour war.. but if a gang misses there chance to start WAR with them... then the gang holds the warehouse for another 2 days.
 Must NOT have players level 53 or higher...

 Sacramento Warehouse - generates 500k-900k a day..
  Gang in control has it for 2 days then there is a 36 hour period were someone can challenge to a 24 hour war.. but if a gang misses there chance to start WAR with them... then the gang holds the warehouse for another 2 days.
 Must NOT have players level 55 or higher...

 Chicago Warehouse - generates 550k-1M a day..
  Gang in control has it for 2 days then there is a 36 hour period were someone can challenge to a 24 hour war.. but if a gang misses there chance to start WAR with them... then the gang holds the warehouse for another 2 days.
 Must NOT have players level 57 or higher...

 Helena Warehouse - generates 600k-1.1M a day..
  Gang in control has it for 2 days then there is a 36 hour period were someone can challenge to a 24 hour war.. but if a gang misses there chance to start WAR with them... then the gang holds the warehouse for another 2 days.
 Must NOT have players level 59 or higher...

 Houston Warehouse - generates 650k-1.2M a day..
  Gang in control has it for 2 days then there is a 36 hour period were someone can challenge to a 24 hour war.. but if a gang misses there chance to start WAR with them... then the gang holds the warehouse for another 2 days.
 Must NOT have players level 63 or higher...

A GANG CAN ONLY CONTROL ONE WAREHOUSE AT A TIME!!!
Logged
iSleptwithJC
Guest
« Reply #46 on: December 12, 2010, 05:52:12 PM »

The only thing I can think of is not letting them leave whilst they control a warehouse, but that's not fair

My single other idea (not sure if it's even possible) is to track them so the computer (mk server) knows that say "The_GrincH" won the "Denver Warehouse" whilst in "[E$V]" and not let him war for another gang until the next warehouse war [E$V] is in

As i said, i'm not sure if this would be possible :/

I thought of something!
Putting a cap on the levels of the members in the gang.
Now, I made this suggestion on my first account, so I can not edit it... so I re-posted it with me revisions to it above this post... check it out.
Logged
Pairot_Returns
Guest
« Reply #47 on: December 14, 2010, 03:27:50 PM »

i think it would end in monopoly from the big gangs which would agree on X gang having X warehouse(s) and so on
this would only unbalance the economy to worse because rich players would be richer and poorer players would still be poor
Logged
iSleptwithJC
Guest
« Reply #48 on: December 14, 2010, 06:25:19 PM »

First of all.. if you do not read my threads from top to bottom.
Do not respond to my threads.
Each time you say something to dispute my ideas, something that has already been
brought up earlier... something I already took my time to fix and modify the idea to appease
to your suggestion.. it makes it look bad.
Due to the fact that many people here are lazy and only read the last view posts.
Which obviously is something you have done.
Now I must take time out of my day to repute these posts trying to discredit my suggestion.

i think it would end in monopoly from the big gangs which would agree on X gang having X warehouse(s) and so on
this would only unbalance the economy to worse because rich players would be richer and poorer players would still be poor

i dont see how this would work cuz TRG and ~M~ would control all the warehouses

i think a gang should be limited to owning it for a month, or limited to owning 1 warehouse at a time, and then someone else gets it, because like was said, the strong gangs will own all the warehouses and the smaller gangs will fall even farther behind, because the bigger gangs wanna be the best and only choose the best so us small people linger back farther and farther everyday

i agree it would be good but if 1 gang owns more than 1 ware house just say 2 you cant have 2 wars at the same time so it would be difficult to hold more than 1 warehouse if you cant challenge because the gang your challenging is already at war

Each gang can only run one warehouse..
No gang with a level 30 or higher can run a warehouse from Baltimore to New Jersey.
No gang with a level 38 or higher can run a warehouse from Denver to New Jersey.
Show me a high level player that is not over level 30.

Now let me break this down to prevent anyone from agreeing with you on this Pairot.
Lets take Black Tie and sYn... pit them against each other for Springfield.
Now if you run the Springfield Warehouse, you get it for two days.
.. and make 350k - 600k a day.
Now that is not NEARLY enough to cover a Real hardcore WAR.
Most gangs in a WAR will use drugs, med certs, and points.
Seeing how these are smart people in a good gang.
They will most likely duke it out without using any of these.
... and if they did use drugs, med certs, and points.
Just to run a Warehouse for two days... that COULD MAYBE give you 1.2M total.
They are losing money. Hell I am a level 30, so someone that can drive or take a bus to Springfield.
Tell this kid how much that costs.

You see, you guys need to read my posts and really think about it before posting.
MK has some real Veterans that do take time to read my suggestions.
With their help I break it down and make it cover all lose ends.

There will NOT be a monopoly, due to a few high level gang members going to each of their sister gangs to take over each cities warehouse.
There will NOT be a flood of money to the game, you make VERY LITTLE off these warehouse's.

What will happen is it will give low level gangs more activity, and a reason to log on more.
They will develop rivalries which will push them to wanna train harder and make more money.
They won't look at the HoF and think they will never make it there.
They won't think it was a bad idea that they started a gang when they could joined one of the top ranked gangs.
They will have fun WAR'ing for a Warehouse.
« Last Edit: December 15, 2010, 01:32:42 AM by iSleptwithJC » Logged
Pairot_Returns
Guest
« Reply #49 on: December 14, 2010, 07:06:29 PM »

First of all.. if you do not read my threads from top to bottom.
Do not respond to my threads.
Each time you say something to dispute my ideas, something that has already been
brought up earlier... something I already took my time to fix and modify the idea to appease
to your suggestion.. it makes it look bad.
Due to the fact that many people here are lazy and only read the last view posts.
Which obviously is something you have done.
Now I must take time out of my day to repute these posts trying to discredit my suggestion.

i think it would end in monopoly from the big gangs which would agree on X gang having X warehouse(s) and so on
this would only unbalance the economy to worse because rich players would be richer and poorer players would still be poor

Each gang can only run one warehouse..
No gang with a level 30 or higher can run a warehouse from Baltimore to New Jersey.
No gang with a level 38 or higher can run a warehouse from Denver to New Jersey.
Show me a high level player that is not over level 30.

Now let me break this down to prevent anyone from agreeing with you on this Pairot.
Lets take Black Tie and sYn... pit them against each other for Springfield.
Now if you run the Springfield Warehouse, you get it for two days.
.. and make 350k - 600k a day.
Now that is not NEARLY enough to cover a Real hardcore WAR.
Most gangs in a WAR will use drugs, med certs, and points.
Seeing how these are smart people in a good gang.
They will most likely duke it out without using any of these.
... and if they did use drugs, med certs, and points.
Just to run a Warehouse for two days... that COULD MAYBE give you 1.2M total.
They are losing money. Hell I am a level 30, so someone that can drive or take a bus to Springfield.
Tell this kid how much that costs.

You see, you guys need to read my posts and really think about it before posting.
MK has some real Veterans that do take time to read my suggestions.
With their help I break it down and make it cover all lose ends.

There will NOT be a monopoly, due to a few high level gang members going to each of their sister gangs to take over each cities warehouse.
There will NOT be a flood of money to the game, you make VERY LITTLE off these warehouse's.

What will happen is it will give low level gangs more activity, and a reason to log on more.
They will develop rivalries which will push them to wanna train harder and make more money.
They won't look at the HoF and think they will never make it there.
They won't think it was a bad idea that they started a gang when they could joined one of the top ranked gangs.
They will have fun WAR'ing for a Warehouse.


who the hell do you think you are to talk me in that way? you have no reason to do so and just because i disagree on your idea it doesn't mean i haven't read it because i did and it's not good imo and SHUT THE F*CK UP IF ALL YOU ARE GOING TO DO IS TALK TO ME LIKE CRAP
« Last Edit: December 15, 2010, 12:13:13 AM by Pairot_Returns » Logged
iSleptwithJC
Guest
« Reply #50 on: December 14, 2010, 08:06:03 PM »

who the hell do you think you are to talk me in that way? you have no reason to do so and just because i disagree on your idea it doesn't mean i haven't read it because i did and it's not good imo and SHUT THE FUCK UP IF ALL YOU ARE GOING TO DO IS TALK TO ME LIKE CRAP

I am someone that spent a lot of time on this idea.
This is something I have been perfecting for over a year now.

Now you say you read my thread..
That means you also read the other posts made by people that brought up glitches in my idea.
Glitches that I have already been made aware of, and made changes to void those glitches.
You must also know that you were not the only one my last post was directed too.

Granted you were the cause of my sudden breakdown to become the asshole I try to avoid being.
But that does not give you valid reason to use profanity in a stickied thread.
If they do not allow words like that in CHAT then they better not allow it in a forum.
Especially on a thread that is stickied.
« Last Edit: December 14, 2010, 08:10:17 PM by iSleptwithJC » Logged
Pairot_Returns
Guest
« Reply #51 on: December 15, 2010, 12:12:32 AM »

it may not be totally directed to me but it was parcially,and even more than other as i was the only one quoted,and i had no right to post insults in the forum i admit and apologize for it but you also had no right in this world to talk to me or anyone else that post was directed to like human crap
Logged
iSleptwithJC
Guest
« Reply #52 on: December 15, 2010, 02:24:50 AM »

it may not be totally directed to me but it was parcially,and even more than other as i was the only one quoted,and i had no right to post insults in the forum i admit and apologize for it but you also had no right in this world to talk to me or anyone else that post was directed to like human crap

When posting such a 'attack' I should of went back and posted the others that have irritated me.
I have modified my post and now you are not the only person I am quoting in it.
Logged
ADIOMONTSHOW69
Nobody
*

Rating: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 9


View Profile
« Reply #53 on: January 29, 2011, 03:03:17 PM »

why not whoever gang has most players in that city¿
Logged
GhostFather7
Guest
« Reply #54 on: February 12, 2011, 05:15:50 PM »

I like this idea
Logged
DeadLeg
Guest
« Reply #55 on: March 15, 2011, 07:09:07 PM »

why not whoever gang has most players in that city¿

That does not make for an exciting addition to the game.
Making it so that you have to WAR for the warehouse, does.
Logged
36PMW
Guest
« Reply #56 on: March 28, 2011, 12:12:36 AM »

i like this idea DL +1

i think the gang that owns a warehouse
should have a majority of the gang members in that city
just an idea
Logged
DeadLeg
Guest
« Reply #57 on: March 31, 2011, 04:10:20 AM »

i like this idea DL +1

i think the gang that owns a warehouse
should have a majority of the gang members in that city
just an idea


Think that would be to much unnecessary coding.
The shortcut I found for that is setting the level CAP on the gangs that can take over a city.
Logged
K1LL4CaLi
Guest
« Reply #58 on: May 13, 2011, 12:53:14 PM »

here is a thought instead of the gang constantly gaining money from owning a warehouse they get other bonuses such as awake, defense, or hp. IDK just an idea. the economy doesnt need to be manipulated. MK economy to wat i seen is very stable. 
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!